Project Details
Projekt Print View

Tracing the spatial and temporal variabilities of tsunamites on Crete Island (Greece) by sedimentological, geophysical and geodetical methods

Subject Area Palaeontology
Term from 2013 to 2016
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 228006711
 
Final Report Year 2017

Final Report Abstract

Since the AD 365 earthquake and co-seismic uplift, Crete's southwestern parts have been exposed to intense erosion. So far, near-coast sedimentary archives have been rarely investigated and sedimentary archives including palaeotsunami fingerprints are unknown. We were able to detect nine geoarchives along the southern and northern coast of Crete that turned out to be appropriate to decipher tsunami signals in the fine-sedimentary records of coastal Crete. For the first time, we detected geoscientific evidence of the AD 365 tsunami impact at the southwestern coast of Crete. Moreover, we found out that older tsunami signals seem to have been erased by the AD 365 event. Also for the first time, tsunamite candidates in the fine-sedimentary record of nearcoastal archives were found at the northern coasts that can be associated with the LBA Santorini eruption and tsunami. Comprehensive fieldwork and detailed laboratory analyses of sediment samples from different types of geo-archives let us decipher the spatial variability of tsunami signatures, for example the Sougia and Palaiochora coastal plains, the area around Rethymnon, Plakias and Agia Fotini in the south. Microfaunal analyses turned out to be a reliable tool to identify tsunamites within the sedimentary record. Depending on the type of geo-archive and its tectonic background, weathering processes have more or less influenced the conservation potential of foraminifera. Tsunami deposits and the way they are conserved in the coastal landscape are strongly dependent on the local relief controlling tsunami inflow and backflow dynamics as well as on the intensity of post-depositional processes. Tsunami signatures as such strongly vary and are intimately related with geomorphological characteristics of the study sites, namely the availability of displaceable sediments, the local topography and the tectonic influence such as crust uplift or crust subsidence. Tectonic uplift triggered by the AD 365 earthquake strongly affected the conservation potential of tsunami deposits especially because of intensified erosion that has affected uplifted coastal sections. In contrast, continuous Holocene subsidence of small geological basins along the north coast provided excellent fine-sedimentary traps. It was possible to reconstruct flow velocity patterns and flow dynamics associated with tsunami landfalls. For Sougia and Palaiochora, scenarios of tsunami wave propagation and landscape changes were presented. An issue still problematic is to obtain reliable age estimates of palaeotsunami events. First, material suitable for dating is not ubiquitous. Second, radiocarbon dating can be problematic because tsunamites usually also contain reworked material which renders sheer maximum ages. Third, using the sandwich dating approach, erosion effects or a post-sedimentary hiatus (for example by soil formation) are not considered. Our studies showed that best-fit age models are obtained by crosscheck-ing radiocarbon with OSL based ages and by comparing dating results from neighbouring geoarchives.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung