Project Details
Projekt Print View

The role of dysfunctional associations and interpretations in panic disorder: An etiological approach.

Subject Area Personality Psychology, Clinical and Medical Psychology, Methodology
Term from 2016 to 2023
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 314131517
 
Final Report Year 2023

Final Report Abstract

An individual’s response towards a certain situation is influenced by what kind of association the situations triggers and how the individual interprets the situation. Put differently, not the situation itself, but the cognitive processing of the situation is the key determinant. For example, for a patient suffering from panic disorder, a fast-beating heart immediately triggers a threat-related association and is interpreted as a sign of an upcoming heart attack. Various psychological disorders are characterized by dysfunctional interpretational processing styles, and such processes are given a central role in many theories of psychopathology and treatment models. Via analogue, experimental, and clinical studies, the present project aimed to advance our understanding of dysfunctional cognitive processes in the context of panic disorder, with a specific focus on panic-related associations and interpretations. Further, a review and metaanalysis was conducted, to examine the psychometric properties of a frequently used task to assess biased interpretational processing. Our main findings can be summarized as follows. Across two samples, i.e., an at-risk and a diagnosed clinical sample, we found positive correlations between panic-related interpretations and panic symptoms. Specifically, a stronger tendency to interpret panic-related information in a dysfunctional manner was related with higher levels of panic symptoms. Further, in the at-risk sample, we found that panic-related interpretations were predictive of stress reactivity, and the relationship between anxiety sensitivity, a risk factor for developing panic disorder, and stress reactivity was mediated by panic-related interpretations. Regarding the patient sample, we found that panic patients, compared to anxious control patients, showed stronger panic-related interpretations. Further, panic-related interpretations correlated with an increase in panic symptoms following a hyperventilation. Results of panic-related associations, however, did not show such a consistent pattern, neither in the clinical nor the risk sample. By means of an online study we tested three different versions of a reaction time task, each version targeting specific panic-relevant associations. Contrary to our expectations, the correlational evidence between specific associations and symptom scores was very limited. We also conducted an experimental study: Via a computerized training, participants had a panic-related interpretation bias induced versus reduced, compared to a control condition. Results showed that the training to reduce panic-related interpretation biases indeed led to more functional interpretations, compared to the other two conditions, and this effect partly generalized to another cognitive task. However, there were no differential training effects on panic-related symptomatology. Finally, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the Scrambled Sentences Task (SST), a frequently used task to assess interpretational processing biases. Results indicated good convergent validity and reliability, albeit in the context of substantial heterogeneity. To conclude, our data provide additional evidence that panic-related interpretations but not associations are a correlate and predictor of panic-relevant symptomatology, and this is important information for both theory refinement and clinical application.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung