Project Details
Projekt Print View

Development of a model for perfectionism-related variations in error processing: Testing the optimisation hypothesis and the avoidance hypothesis in a multimodal approach

Subject Area Personality Psychology, Clinical and Medical Psychology, Methodology
Term from 2019 to 2023
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 422815754
 
Final Report Year 2023

Final Report Abstract

To err is human, but not from the perspective of a perfectionistic person. In a series of four EEG studies and one behavioral study, this project investigates the relationship between behavior and neural correlates of error processing in individuals with different levels of perfectionism. The starting point of the project were three hypotheses on perfectionismrelated specifics in error processing: (a) individuals with high personal standards perfectionism use information from error trials to optimize their behavior (optimization hypothesis); individuals with high evaluative concerns perfectionism (b) either attempt to avoid error processing to reduce negative emotions related to errors and the anticipated negative evaluation by others (avoidance hypothesis), or (c) they are less capable of processing errors due to cognitive capacity being consumed by worries about negative evaluation by others (capacity hypothesis). In the first part (N=30 und N=33), we developed a challenging task (the eight-alternative response task) designed to induce sufficient errors to investigate individuals’ striving for perfection in their responses. In the subsequent part, we employed several alterations of the task, such as explicitly instructing self-evaluation or varying the number of stimulus-response assignments. The project utilized a multi-method approach, incorporating behavioral measures, EEG data, machine-learning-based classification, and computational modeling. Several findings in neural and behavioral correlates indicated that individuals with high evaluative concerns lack the capacity to process errors adequately, rather than explicitly avoid error processing. The primary electrophysiological finding, a statistical interaction between the two facets of perfectionism and response accuracy in relation to error-related negativity, observed in Study 2 (N=90), was replicated in Study 3 (N=137). Preliminary analyses of Study 4 (N=124) further support the capacity hypothesis. Conversely, the optimization hypothesis could neither be confirmed nor falsified by the findings of this project. The results related to both the newly developed task and the perfectionism approach have already inspired several follow-up studies. One of these future studies may contribute to a better understanding of clinically relevant perfectionism, such as in individuals with depression. Since perfectionism is a transdiagnostic phenomenon observed in various conditions like eating disorders, anxiety disorders, and depression, gaining insight into potentially dysfunctional cognitive-emotional strategies may specify therapeutic approaches.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung