Project Details
Projekt Print View

What citizens want from deliberative forms of participation: mapping legitimacy perceptions with an online survey and a preference experiment

Subject Area Political Science
Term from 2019 to 2022
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 432370948
 
Final Report Year 2023

Final Report Abstract

The research project "Perleg” shows that non-participating (representative) citizen in Germany, United States, Ireland and Finland think that deliberative citizen forums (DCFs) are quite attractive institutional innovations but in general are very reluctant to grant them empowerment and autonomy as well as ask for additional provisions. Citizens in general want DCFs to be constricted: non-empowered (limited to an advisory role), coupled (collaborating with legacy actors), and complying with extra provisions, namely descriptively representative composition via random selection, large size, and clear majorities for recommendations. However, disenchanted citizens and citizens who have made positive experiences with DCFs are more open to the empowerment and decoupling of deliberative citizen forums compared to allegiant citizens and citizens who are unfamiliar with DCFs, but this not imply that they are generally in favour of such design features (in fact, they are mostly indifferent vis-à-vis empowerment and decoupling). The project also shows that sensitization for DCFs matter: the more citizens know about DCFs, the more supportive there are. Overall, the project findings suggest that "recreating feelings of "ownership” of the democratic process via citizen forums might turn out to be a rockier road than many advocates have imagined” (Goldberg and Bächtiger 2022). Empowering DCFs – as some advocates have proposed - might eventually decrease (rather than increase) citizens’ satisfaction with democracy.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung