Project Details
Projekt Print View

Whistle-blowing regulation: A uniform or tailored approach?

Subject Area Accounting and Finance
Term from 2016 to 2018
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 315357377
 
Final Report Year 2019

Final Report Abstract

The central contention in this study, informed by path dependence theory, argues that a uniform approach to the design and implementation of whistle-blowing regulation may not be effective if transplanted into another country because of its unique history and culture. The purpose of this study is to test whether U.S.-style regulatory intervention can be immediately effective if transplanted into another country with different cultural attitudes and value orientations toward whistle-blowing—specifically, Germany. Our study focuses on these short-term, or what we term as ‘immediate’ effects, because the introduction of whistle-blowing laws can possibly influence long-run attitudes toward whistle-blowing. We conduct a laboratory experiment where accountants as participants assume the role of an internal auditor who discovers a material financial statement fraud and examines their whistle-blowing intention. We manipulate the presence or absence of two U.S.-style regulatory interventions: anti-retaliation protection for internal and external whistle-blowing (Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and monetary rewards for external whistle-blowing (Dodd-Frank Act of 2010). A total of 98 U.S. and 84 German accountants completed the experiment. We gather data from accountants employed in a role within an organization because they are a key stakeholder who are well-positioned to detect and blow the whistle on organizational fraud and misconduct. We hypothesize and find that the provision of anti-retaliation protection and monetary rewards encourage U.S. accountants to blow the whistle. In contrast, among German accountants, where their country features a historical fear and distrust of whistle-blowers, U.S.-style regulatory interventions are less effective. Together, our findings provide strong support for the theory of path-dependence, suggesting that whistle-blowing regulation should not be uniformly transplanted without due consideration of the unique history and culture of a country.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung