Detailseite
Projekt Druckansicht

Nichtedelmetall-basierte Nanodrahtnetzwerke als neue trägerfreie Katalysatorstrukturen in alkalischen Brennstoffzellen

Fachliche Zuordnung Physikalische Chemie von Festkörpern und Oberflächen, Materialcharakterisierung
Förderung Förderung von 2017 bis 2021
Projektkennung Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 342145578
 
Erstellungsjahr 2021

Zusammenfassung der Projektergebnisse

In collaboration between AG Ensinger (nanomaterials synthesis) and AG Roth (electrochemical process engineering) 1D and 3D Ni and Ni-Pd nanowire structures have been synthesised and up-scaled for their implementation as non-precious metal support-free bulk structures into AEMFC. These structures could be tailored in a wide variety and are active and stable electrocatalysts for ORR and alcohol oxidation. A suitable AEMFC set-up has been built and commercial Pt catalysts tested. Detailed results of AG Roth: The initially determined specific activity at -0.03 V shows that the Pt ORR activity is around 40 times higher than for the Ni catalyst. However, upon detailed analysis of polarisation curves using the new concept of differential Tafel plots (DTP), we found that at -0.03 V there is also a significant influence of the charging current and, hence, the specific activity measured at this potential is not a reasonable value. The region of constant α in the DTP is the region where the specific activity should be determined. Considering this, the specific activity of Pt depending on the overpotential is about 100 to 150 times higher than the synthesized Ni catalyst. However, considering that the operating range of fuel cells ranges between 0.6 and 0.7 V, there is a penalty of 150-200 mV in overpotential. Considering the cost benefits, this lesser performance is acceptable on the device level. While the electrochemical characterisation of Ni nanowires in the three-electrode set-up was successful, the up-scaled version of these catalysts could not be implemented in the AEMFC due to operational problems. As we have seen in WP 2, because of two opposing factors, i.e. water diffusion and electroosmotic drag, it is very difficult to obtain a stable performance. In PEMFC, only the excess water needs to be flushed out of the cathode for stable operation. In AEMFC, however, all the water transport must be balanced precisely at every current value. For example, for a stable performance at a given current, the water flux from anode to cathode should be higher or equal to the water flux from cathode to anode due to the electroosmotic drag. In our study, we have used Fumatech FAA membranes which have a low diffusion coefficient of water and high electroosmotic drag coefficient. This resulted in anode flooding in our experiments, which kept us from further testbench tests of our tailored non-precious metal catalysts.

Projektbezogene Publikationen (Auswahl)

 
 

Zusatzinformationen

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung