Project Details
Projekt Print View

Re-imagining communities through cultural property restitition: the Austrian, Italian and (West) German cases, 1945-1998

Subject Area Modern and Contemporary History
Term from 2018 to 2024
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 388532666
 
Final Report Year 2024

Final Report Abstract

The project analyses the history of restitution of fascist-looted cultural property in post-war Italy, Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany from the end of WWII to the 1998 signing of the ‘Washington Declaration on Nazi-confiscated Art’. Conceived as a social history of restitution in the context of Cold War and post-1989 Europe, the project investigates the impact of restitution on local and national identities vis-à-vis the struggle to come to terms with the fascist past. As the project was able to determine through a vast array of Italian, Austrian, German, US and British archival sources, restitution played a pivotal role in the cathartic rebuilding of the Italian, Austrian and West German communities after WWII. Especially between the immediate aftermath of the war and the late 1950s, the rhetoric of restitution represented an extremely useful means of staging a clean cut with the fascist past while at the same time placing all blame onto Nazi Germany (in the case of Italy and Austria) or the NSDAP leadership (in the West German case) in order to exculpate the state apparatus and the Italians, Austrians and Germans who had actively taken part in the expropriation of their fellow citizens. As a result, at least until the late 1960s restitution was often implemented as a way of actually avoiding having to deal with the Holocaust and its aftermath, both in social and political terms. Despite the staggering efficiency of the Fascist and Austro-fascist confiscation machines, for decades the rights of the legitimate owners (or their heirs) were thereby not only forgotten but sometimes even, once again, violated. Even when restitution to Jewish citizens or communities did take place, in fact, the process sometimes turned into yet another instance of discrimination or loss (human, as well as material), or, in the best-case scenario, provided an alibi that reduced the process of Wiedergutmachung to a simple financial transaction, devoid of social or political meaning, a transaction that could even be questioned, as testified by the Hans Deutsch affair. Equally importantly, while at least until the 1960s all three countries usually resorted to restitution as a way of distancing themselves from their fascist past without effecting any deeper social and political reckoning nor tackling the persistence of anti-Semitism – in their leadership as in society at large – Italy took it one step further: in postwar Italy, cultural restitution quickly came to represent one of the main facets of the total whitewashing of Fascist crimes and the construction of the victim myth, on one side, but also of the political use of heritage in (re)building the national community through a conception of heritage that showed remarkable continuities with its Fascist predecessor. It was only after the end of the Cold War that the country would take the first steps toward a more comprehensive processing of fascist crimes, but this phase was to be remarkably brief.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung