Project Details
Projekt Print View

Differential mechanisms of cognitive impairment due to task-irrelevant sounds in children and adults

Subject Area General, Cognitive and Mathematical Psychology
Acoustics
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Term from 2018 to 2023
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 401278266
 
Final Report Year 2022

Final Report Abstract

In a joint project of Cognitive Psychology, Developmental Psychology and Acoustics, the effects of task‐irrelevant sounds on performance in working memory tasks were explored in children and adults. Through sys‐ tematic variation of sound characteristics and task requirements, we tested the predictions derived from cur‐ rent accounts of noise‐induced performance decrements, i.e., the Attention‐capture Account and the Chang‐ ing‐state Account. According to the latter, the reliable disruption of serial recall performance due to changing‐state irrelevant sounds results from specific interference between order cues derived from automatic, obligatory sound processing, and deliberate rehearsal of the serial order of the list items. In addition, the project aimed at comparing the effects of simple, monaural‐diotic presentation vs. realistic, binaural presentation of task‐irrelevant sound scenarios. Contrasting the predictions of the Changing‐state Account, the current experiments consistently showed that serial order retention is neither necessary nor sufficient for evocation of a disruption by changing‐state speech. Rather, the disruptive effect of background speech seems to be confined to tasks that require storage and/or processing of phonological information. These conclusions are based on the following findings: A serial nonverbal task (serial recall of visuo‐spatial items) was immune against a disruption through irrelevant speech (changing‐state syllables), whereas phonological tasks with and without seriation (serial recall of words presented pictorially and classification of the words´ initial sounds, respectively) were significantly and equally disrupted. An analogue of the non‐serial task which required a semantic instead of a phonological classification remained unaffected. Concerning the verbal serial recall task, a reduction of rehearsal by means of rapid item presentation did not reduce the disruptive effect of the syllable sequences. The task specificity of the disruption evoked by irrelevant speech poses difficulties not only for the Changing‐state Account, but also for the Attention‐capture Account. Further findings yielded additional problems for the latter. First, the disruptive effects were unrelated to the participants´ attention control (measured by working memory capacity), second, meaningful nonspeech sounds (mixtures of environmental sounds such as telephone ringing, dog barking; office‐noise scenarios) did not impair verbal serial recall in children and adults, and third, the disruptive effect of classroom‐ and office‐noise scenarios with speech did not increase when a realistic, binaural presentation was used instead of simple, monaural‐diotic presentation. Taken together, the current results suggest that the reliable disruption evoked by irrelevant sounds with spoken parts results from specific interference with the storage and/or processing of phonological information in working memory.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung