Project Details
Projekt Print View

Contested solidarity. Dynamics of solidarity between day-to-day business and crisis

Subject Area Sociological Theory
Empirical Social Research
Term from 2021 to 2024
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 459765303
 
Final Report Year 2025

Final Report Abstract

The research project “Contested solidarity. Dynamics of ssolidarity between everyday business and crisis” examines the development of the German welfare state since 2003 with a focus on statutory health insurance (SHI) and basic security for jobseekers (SGB II). The central question is how the understanding of solidarity changes in the welfare state reforms and in times of crisis and how solidarity practices in social policy on the part of the state and civil society actors relate to each other. The project is divided into three sub-projects: Sub-project 1 examines state solidarity by analyzing the normative and institutional changes in SHI and SGB II in the course of and after the Hartz reforms. Sub-project 2 is dedicated to the role of civil society in the welfare state by analyzing the reactions of civil society actors to changes in state social policy. Sub-project 3 deals with solidarity in times of crises, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, and examines how crises can both promote and challenge social solidarity. Empirically, the study is based on the evaluation of over 290 primary documents and 20 problem-centered interviews with civil society actors, which were analyzed with the help of Maxqda. The results show that solidarity continues to play a central role in the German welfare state despite market-oriented reforms, but that the normative meaning of this term is shifting in its use by state actors. The transformation of welfare state benefits as part of the Hartz reforms illustrates the increasing shift from universal to more selective models of solidarity that emphasize individual responsibility. The categories negotiated in the political discourse are sometimes translated into stereotyping prejudices against certain groups of benefit recipients in the media and with great public impact. On the other hand, there are universalistic ideas and practices of solidarity by civil society organizations, which are often at odds with state social policy.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung